Return to site

Opponents of Nuclear Power are paranoid??

Or they understand technology and human folly!

· Nukes,Nuclear Bomb,Nuclear Waste,Robert Jacobs

In response to Bhaskar Sunkara’s "recent opinion piece extoling the virtues of nuclear power and castigating its opponents as paranoid and ill-informed, Robert Jacobs of the Hiroshima Peace Institute   (  https://www.peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp/  ) wrote an article in Counterpunch that caught my attention, as it should catch all our attentions.  

He writes: "Bhaskar Sunkara is clearly motivated by his deep concerns over the dire impacts of global warming, which loom closer by the hour. Unfortunately, his arguments amount to little more than regurgitated industry talking points, in their traditional form of a Jeremiad...." 

https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/09/nuclear-stockholm-syndrome/

He continues: "I too wish that the things that the nuclear industry says about itself were true—I wish it was green and renewable. I wish that there weren’t multiple uranium mining sites around the world with thousands of tons of uranium tailings abandoned and open to the elements, continuing to harm the health of generations born long after mining ceased. I wish that it didn’t take immense, carbon-intensive mining projects to extract uranium from the Earth, and then again to “deposit” the spent nuclear fuel from reactors back half a kilometer underground. Estimates before construction began at Onkalo spent fuel repository in Finland were that the site would entail a “half-billion-euro construction project will generate some 2,500 person years of employment,” and would take 100 years to complete. That is just to contain the spent fuel from five nuclear power plants. The United States, by contrast, has 94 commercial nuclear power plants. There is still no actual plan for the astonishingly large and carbon-intensive site it will take to bury the more than 140,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel, with some hope of containing it for thousands of generations of future human beings. This doesn’t include the thousands of tons of spent nuclear fuel from the nuclear reactors operated by the US military to provide the fissile cores of more than 70,000 nuclear weapons during the Cold War...."